← All comparisons

Tool matchup

Clay vs Miro

Clay vs Miro for consultants. Clay fits Lead Gen & Outbound workflows; Miro fits Delivery & Reporting workflows. See when to choose each.

Clay

Niche Fit

Data enrichment and go-to-market automation. Pull from dozens of premium data providers → enrich → score → export. AI agents build your pipelines for you.

From $149/mo 2 hour setup
65/100

Miro

Default

Collaborative whiteboard with 1,000+ templates including Business Model Canvas, SWOT, Porter's Five Forces, and strategy frameworks. The de facto whiteboard for consulting strategy delivery and workshop facilitation. Voting, timers, sticky notes, and presentation mode built in.

From $8/mo 5 min setup
87/100

Verdict

Miro leads by 22 points (clear winner).

Decision guidance

  • Miro currently leads with 87/100.
  • Miro strength: Strong on UX quality.
  • Clay main weakness in this matchup: Strong on pricing.

Client-ready brief

Get this comparison decision brief

Send a concise summary of winner, trade-offs, and rollout recommendation.

  • Clay: 65/100
  • Miro: 87/100
  • Miro leads by 22 points (clear winner).

Swipe sideways to compare all columns.

Clay

Miro

Quick facts
Pricing sanityFrom $149/moFrom $8/mo
Setup speed2 hour setup5 min setup
IntelligenceMediumHigh
Integrations4+17+
Score breakdown
Outcome fit
19/25
22/25
Setup speed
10/20
17/20
Pricing sanity
6/15
12/15
Integrations
12/15
13/15
UX polish
10/15
14/15
Trust & support
8/10
9/10
Summary
Best forGrowth-stage consultants sending 500+ emails/month who need custom data enrichment.Consultants running strategy workshops, brainstorming sessions, and framework exercises with clients.
Key strengthStrong on integrationsStrong on UX quality
Main weaknessStrong on pricingStrong on pricing

Guides

Guides for this matchup

Still deciding?

Take our 2-minute quiz and get a personalized tool recommendation for your workflow.

Take the quiz

More comparisons

Compare with others